| 1 |
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 11:23:37PM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote |
| 2 |
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 4:34 PM, William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> >> I'd rather avoid adding more of this until we figure out what to do |
| 4 |
> >> about multiple Lua versions. The Lua5.1/5.2 split is still stuck |
| 5 |
> >> nowhere, and luajit is yet another variant to handle. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > If we don't do this, the only way to add luajit support to dev-lua/busted is to |
| 8 |
> > propegate the local use flag into all of its dependencies [1], and that is |
| 9 |
> > what I'm trying to avoid. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> rspamd has (since [1]) used the jit flag to distinguish between lua |
| 12 |
> and luajit for a while. Then, lua is about lua support in general, and |
| 13 |
> jit can select between lua and luajit. This is maybe not the best |
| 14 |
> solution, but not so bad either, in my view. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Seamonkey and Firefox both have a "jit" USE flag, which I doubt has |
| 17 |
anything to do with lua/luajit. "lua" and "luajit" appear to be |
| 18 |
languages. They should have flags just like fortran and gcj. It appear |
| 19 |
that the default is "-luajit", and "luajit" turns it on. BTW... |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
grep ":luajit " /usr/portage/profiles/use.local.desc | wc -l |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
...gives 17 hits. It looks like a good candidate for "globalization". |
| 24 |
Note the trailing space. There are 2 for USE flag "luajittex" for |
| 25 |
app-text/texlive-core and dev-texlive/texlive-basic |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |
| 29 |
I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications |
Archives