| 1 |
Petteri Räty schrieb: |
| 2 |
> Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti: |
| 3 |
>> On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:06:40 +0300 |
| 4 |
>> Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> But is there anything that makes use of version specific DESCRIPTION |
| 6 |
>>> atoms? |
| 7 |
>> Yep. Have a look at sys-devel/gcc for example. Some versions include |
| 8 |
>> various extensions, and say so in DESCRIPTION. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I did say in my original mail that there are ebuilds building dynamic |
| 12 |
> DESCRIPTION variables but the my question was that does anything make |
| 13 |
> use of their dynamic nature. I think for example eix only looks at the |
| 14 |
> latest. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Because it spuriously assumes that only the latest one is relevant and |
| 17 |
it therefore doesn't do any ${PV} substitution (which is correct |
| 18 |
behavior under this assumption). |
Archives