1 |
On 04/27/2012 11:01 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
2 |
>>>>>> On Fri, 27 Apr 2012, Zac Medico wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> Since we've managed to survive up to this point without such a |
5 |
>> feature, I think it's worth the wait roll it into EAPI 5 and have a |
6 |
>> clean solution that doesn't rely on package manager interaction with |
7 |
>> eclasses. If we quickly draft an EAPI 5 spec, there's still have |
8 |
>> time to have it approved at the next council meeting. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Did I get it right, you are thinking about a special EAPI only for |
11 |
> user patches? I'd say that the feature is not important enough to |
12 |
> justify that. |
13 |
|
14 |
Let's just say that it's within the realm of possibilities, and I |
15 |
consider it to be preferable to a solution which involves package |
16 |
manager interaction with epatch_user. |
17 |
-- |
18 |
Thanks, |
19 |
Zac |