Archives
Archives
| From: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages masked for lack of maintainer, but metadata.xml says otherwise | ||
| Date: | Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:45:15 | ||
| Message-Id: | 201202021844.35404.vapier@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Packages masked for lack of maintainer, but metadata.xml says otherwise by "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn" |
||
| 1 | On Thursday 02 February 2012 17:56:16 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: |
| 2 | > there have been a number of packages masked lately due to lack of |
| 3 | > maintainer. However, their metadata.xml does not list |
| 4 | > maintainer-needed@g.o which I think should be the first step in |
| 5 | > searching for a new maintainer. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | if there is no <herd> and no <maintainer>, then "maintainer-needed@g.o" is |
| 8 | implicit. why do we need to explicitly list it ? |
| 9 | -mike |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages masked for lack of maintainer, but metadata.xml says otherwise | "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn" <chithanh@g.o> |