Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 10:17:38
Message-Id: CAKmKYaCgdi8uFssF=7rMhAunAs4=qRPgycT0uJYLVGQOhXkuLA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote:
> Of course, there's a much larger infra component to the git migration, so > either having that someone being an infra person, or at least having > someone from infra have the time and be willing to work closely with > them, is going to be critical.  But again, given a council "*priority*, > let's move on it!" decision, I'd at least /hope/ that's not a blocker.
Yeah... this is why I was asking about access to infra to test the conversion; so far, I haven't had any replies, though. Cheers, Dirkjan

Replies