| 1 |
mån 2010-04-05 klockan 03:54 +0300 skrev Mart Raudsepp: |
| 2 |
> The problem is really the RESOLVED connotation and the hiding that goes |
| 3 |
> along with that on searches, etc. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> The LATER status itself can be useful when used properly (more as |
| 6 |
> "ASSIGNED LATER"). In the lack of that some bigger teams might need to |
| 7 |
> think of other methods to get things meant for LATER out of main views |
| 8 |
> of huge bug lists. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Actually I think this is the best yet. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I have always found the sounding of RESOLVED LATER so harsh. ASSIGNED |
| 13 |
LATER would more sound like we know there is a problem, and we know it |
| 14 |
should be fixed, but we cannot do it now for different reasons. |
Archives