1 |
· Thomas de Grenier de Latour <degrenier@×××××××××××.fr>: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 10:02:25 +0100, Alexander Skwar |
4 |
> <listen@×××××××××××××××.name> wrote: |
5 |
> |
6 |
>> The problem with that is, that openURL accepts two parameters and |
7 |
>> they are seperated with a ,. So it sees two parameters: |
8 |
>> http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/0,1518,447923 and 00.html - 00.html |
9 |
>> is not a valid parameter, though. It should be something like |
10 |
>> new-window. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Btw, that's Mozilla bug #298960: |
13 |
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=298960 |
14 |
|
15 |
Thanks. |
16 |
|
17 |
>> Having had a closer "look" at this, I dislike this patch. Reason: |
18 |
>> Up to now firefox eventually runs the openURL remote command. Users |
19 |
>> might know this and might make use of this. So a user might call |
20 |
>> "firefox http://gentoo.org/,new-tab" to have http://gentoo.org/ |
21 |
>> opened in a new tab. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Imho, that a hack works at some point doesn't mean it is a supported |
24 |
> feature that devs should care about never breaking. |
25 |
|
26 |
Okay, ACK. |
27 |
|
28 |
> Thus, the |
29 |
> launcher script could add such a dummy argument when $MOZILLA_NEWTYPE |
30 |
> is not set. |
31 |
|
32 |
The question was, however, why use this launcher script at all? |
33 |
What's the use of it? What would break, if mozilla-launcher were |
34 |
dumped? Why add even more magic to something, which shouldn't |
35 |
even be there (anymore)? |
36 |
|
37 |
I realize, that "back then" such a script was required, as |
38 |
Mozilla 1.2 (?) would start the profile manager, if "mozilla" |
39 |
was run a 2nd time when mozilla was already running. But that's |
40 |
historic. |
41 |
|
42 |
Alexander Skwar |
43 |
-- |
44 |
When someone says "I want a programming language in which I need only |
45 |
say what I wish done," give him a lollipop. |
46 |
|
47 |
|
48 |
-- |
49 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |