Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:14:40
Message-Id: CAKmKYaAwzmbnfi7h1AWhbDVikF1QSAQG3LF5uqP86W96HWO2gw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by Rich Freeman
1 On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote:
2 > If you want the tree to be traceable to Gentoo devs, then rewriting
3 > the signatures is probably a good thing.
4
5 I'd say that signing the merge commit is good enough. It says the
6 Gentoo dev who merged it has reviewed the changes and can be held
7 responsible for them. One could even say that he mediates a
8 web-of-trust to the more casual contributor who signed the original
9 csets.
10
11 Cheers,
12
13 Dirkjan