| 1 |
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Lars Wendler <polynomial-c@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 21:24:38 +0100 Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>Am Sonntag, 26. Februar 2017, 21:16:28 CET schrieb Lars Wendler: |
| 5 |
>>> I am completely against removal of this header line. It does _not_ do |
| 6 |
>>> any harm and I don't understand why people want it to be removed so |
| 7 |
>>> badly. |
| 8 |
>>> Now QA again wants to do a questionable action _without_ any approval |
| 9 |
>>> from neither infra nor council. |
| 10 |
>>[snip] |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>>October 2014 council meeting: |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>>Can we drop CVS headers post-migration? |
| 15 |
>>Aye: blueness, creffett (proxy for ulm), dberkholz, dilfridge, |
| 16 |
>>radhermit, rich0, williamh |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> $Id$ is _NOT_ the CVS header. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Do we really need to put it on the Council agenda just so that the |
| 23 |
same group of people can approve it again? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Rich |
Archives