| 1 |
2008/6/22 Peter Weller <welp@g.o>: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 2008-06-22 at 15:49 +0200, Alin Nstac wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Peter Volkov wrote: |
| 4 |
>> > ÷ óÂÔ, 21/06/2008 × 10:56 +0200, Albert Zeyer ÐÉÛÅÔ: |
| 5 |
>> > |
| 6 |
>> >> Perhaps install a script which automatically takes the CVS comment when |
| 7 |
>> >> some of these files is changed and adds this comment automatically to |
| 8 |
>> >> the ChangeLog? |
| 9 |
>> >> |
| 10 |
>> > |
| 11 |
>> > Some days ago Diego (flameeyes) suggested to write script which will |
| 12 |
>> > abort commit in case ChangeLog is not filled. Taking into account a |
| 13 |
>> > number (about 1 commit per day(!)) of developers who forgive to use |
| 14 |
>> > echangelog I think this is the only way to go if we want that |
| 15 |
>> > ChangeLog's to be useful... |
| 16 |
>> > |
| 17 |
>> > |
| 18 |
>> How about fixing the right problem instead forcing devs to complete yet |
| 19 |
>> another step? |
| 20 |
>> The right way of fixing that is by creating changelogs automatically, |
| 21 |
>> based on cvs commit comments. |
| 22 |
>> |
| 23 |
> Possibly by making it a part of the whole repoman commit process? I'm |
| 24 |
> pretty sure I've mentioned this in a council meeting: |
| 25 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20080508-summary.txt |
| 26 |
> (Check the 'New Topics' -> 'When are ChangeLog entries required?' |
| 27 |
> summary) |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
The portage team is always open for repoman improvements ;) |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> -- |
| 33 |
> gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> |
Archives