Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Aaron W. Swenson" <titanofold@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 12:06:57
Message-Id: 4FC75E3A.4000903@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by Dirkjan Ochtman
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 05/30/2012 04:31 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Robin H. Johnson > <robbat2@g.o> wrote: >> No, the last mock conversion is still live and updating fairly >> often: >> http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary > >> > Since you seem to know most about this project, can you give a > short summary on what *you* think are hard blockers for the > migration? > > Cheers, > > Dirkjan >
The 6 hours it takes to clone the repo. - - Aaron -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAk/HXjoACgkQVxOqA9G7/aB2DwD+JqdcMJDIfu30Oht8rB6H/pMY Wr1RjhujZvVGIDQG55QA/jPlsWh3c8El7HjxzhjoCNIPkV1Vj3b7VZVc/D6y6oq9 =FxGY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies