Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: treecleaner removals
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:28:51
Message-Id: 451C2FBF.9050004@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: treecleaner removals by gentoo@faulhammer.org (Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer)
1 Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer wrote:
2 > Tach David, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
3 >
4 > David Grant schrieb:
5 >> On 9/28/06, Michael Cummings <mcummings@g.o> wrote:
6 >>> +++ Mark Stier [28/09/06 15:35 +0200]:
7 >>>> How about entering the removed ebuilds into bugzilla under an adequate
8 >>>> section?
9 >>> I think my original reply got lost, so just in case - seems like a time
10 >>> for sunset overlays ;0
11 >> or sunrise rather...
12 >
13 > New packages not yet in the tree -> sunrise
14 > Old crufty packages removed from the tree -> sunset
15 >
16 > Got it?
17 >
18 > V-Li
19 >
20
21 There is a TreeCleaner Project overlay; but I was planning on placing
22 tools in it; I may be convinced to add the ebuilds (and their files)
23 that we clean to it; assuming it doesn't take anyone that long to do it;
24 the problem being for some things that live only on our mirrors; the
25 ebuilds won't work as the files get purged after two weeks. Let me
26 consider this though; if we can script it somehow it would maybe benefit
27 others (a treecleaner poopy overlay for Layman also...)
28
29 --
30 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: treecleaner removals David Grant <davidgrant@×××××.com>