Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs/libusbx:1 the default provider for virtual/libusb:1 (for ~arch)
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 00:18:02
Message-Id: 4FC2C3E3.7050305@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs/libusbx:1 the default provider for virtual/libusb:1 (for ~arch) by Samuli Suominen
On 05/27/2012 11:12 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Fedora rawhide and ArchLinux switched to libusbx and followed suit in > our virtual/libusb:1. > Debian is considering the switch also. We'll see... > > I've been in contact with the new maintainer, and he assured me the > compability will be kept for libusb-compat. > > Happy testing, > > # emerge -C dev-libs/libusb:1 > # emerge -1 dev-libs/libusbx:1
I've tried this on my laptop, and afterwards it wouldn't suspend to ram when it was supposed to. I didn't do any real troubleshooting, so I'm just mentioning it here in case it helps someone else recognize the source of the problem. This was with sys-power/upower-0.9.16 and dev-libs/libusbx-1.0.11 (I didn't try to rebuild upower after switching from dev-libs/libusb-1.0.9 to dev-libs/libusbx-1.0.11). -- Thanks, Zac

Replies