| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh schrieb: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 10:17:24 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn <chithanh@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> Then ebuilds will fail just the same |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> No. Before, ebuilds would maybe display an upgrading message when |
| 7 |
>> they shouldn't, or vice versa. Now the eclass dies on them. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> This attitude that invisible failures (which don't get fixed, and which |
| 10 |
> lead to occasional weirdness) are better than visible failures (which |
| 11 |
> must be fixed) is an odd one... Postel has a lot to answer for. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I would agree with you when it comes to upstreams' -Werror but I do realize |
| 14 |
that I am in the minority there. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
My point here is that this change will affect the behaviour of ebuilds using |
| 17 |
this eclass. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Best regards, |
| 21 |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Archives