Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)" <klondike@g.o>
To: Gentoo Development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] New subproject: Hardened uClibc
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 18:45:09
Message-Id: 5096B75F.5010208@gentoo.org
1 El 03/11/12 14:35, Anthony G. Basile escribió:
2 > Hi everyone,
3 >
4 > I'd like to announce a new subproject of Hardened Gentoo: Hardened
5 > uClibc. It is an effort to port both tool chain and kernel hardening
6 > to uClibc based systems for a variety of architectures, treating
7 > uClibc more as a drop in alternative to glibc, and not necessarily as
8 > "embedded". Embedded systems aim to produce kernels and user lands
9 > with tiny footprints, and so tend to use busybox as their "Swiss Army
10 > Knife" of common UNIX utilities. While not excluding this possibility,
11 > we aim at making most (all?) of Gentoo's packages both hardened and
12 > uClibc compatible.
13 >
14 > The subproject crosses three areas: hardened, embedded and releng.
15 > For a while I was just manually building and tarballing chroots, but
16 > I'm migrating to proper stage3's built using catalyst. The following
17 > table gives a brief summary of the current state of affairs:
18 >
19 > Arch ABI(s) Medium
20 > amd64 Generic stage3 desktop
21 > arm armv7a stage4
22 > mips mips32r2 mipsel32r2 stage4
23 > x86 i686 stage3
24 > ppc <in progress>
25 >
26 > These are available on the mirrors under
27 > ${MIRROR}/expiermental/${ARCH}/uclibc.
28 >
29 > uClibc has made it quite a ways in the last few years. For amd64, I
30 > built an entire desktop system based on XFCE4 which is also on the
31 > mirrors. However, this is still work in progress and should be
32 > considered experimental. Eg. upgrading the desktop from glib-2.30.3 to
33 > glib-2.32.4-r1 breaks. The stage3's are the closest to being stable.
34 >
35 > The project homepage is at http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/hardened/uclibc/
36 Back then I already discussed how this project description leads to
37 confusion on users, and as such I opened bug 441014
38 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441014 I'm still waiting for
39 blueness answers on this since he was the one who asked me to open said
40 bug. Meanwhile missinformation keeps being spread out.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature