| 1 |
On 09/23/2013 02:46 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 16:25:40 +0300 |
| 3 |
> Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> profiles.desc status is about how repoman is used to scan KEYWORDS, |
| 6 |
>> and those arch maintainers with only ~arch keywording use `repoman |
| 7 |
>> --include-dev` so changing the status from 'dev' to 'stable' won't |
| 8 |
>> gain anything scanning wise |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> not entirely true: repoman is for _every_ dev. |
| 11 |
> facts are explained here: |
| 12 |
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/76909 |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> in practice, profiles.desc and arch/~arch are orthogonal. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Yes in practice they are orthogonal. One could argue that all profiles |
| 18 |
should be marked 'stable' in order to improve the overall dependency |
| 19 |
coverage and stability because, lets face it, very few devs run repoman -d. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Regards, |
| 23 |
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 24 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang |
Archives