| 1 |
On 4/3/06, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò <flameeyes@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tuesday 04 April 2006 01:05, m h wrote: |
| 3 |
> > This isn't meant as flamebait. I'm running stable on my laptop and |
| 4 |
> > unstable on my desktop. It seems like most KDE release get better |
| 5 |
> > over time, so I'm just wondering what the process is with KDE? |
| 6 |
> KDE 3.5.0 was quite broken -and required more patches than usual to get to an |
| 7 |
> usable state-, KDE 3.5.1 was a bit better but stills some patches were |
| 8 |
> needed, KDE 3.5.2 is in portage since less than a month, and already had a |
| 9 |
> few patches with revbumps to few memleaks and crashes, a new kdelibs revbump |
| 10 |
> is also planned, and umbrello 3.5.2 is regressed compared to 3.5.1 (that |
| 11 |
> still, vanilla, wasn't usable for activity diagrams at all). |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> That said, I doubt we can have anything stable in less that another month or |
| 14 |
> even two. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Diego - |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Thanks for the response. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Steve- |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Sorry to abuse the list. Feel free to point me to the correct place |
| 24 |
to post this. I noticed it in the forums a few times without any |
| 25 |
answer. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives