Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: R0b0t1 <r030t1@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Signed push & clock drift rejection
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 19:28:40
Message-Id: CAAD4mYiRLMOdnB_-rnBo6-kfueMDkqmmeCTqBmAaNU9kqzJx2g@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Signed push & clock drift rejection by Andrew Savchenko
1 On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@g.o> wrote:
2 > - System may become *vulnerable* because of time stamp based attack.
3 > Though it is not easy to use such behaviour, it is still possible.
4
5 All offline attacks are harder, even ones which haven't been invented yet.