| 1 |
On Monday 30 April 2012 22:57:29 Walter Dnes wrote: |
| 2 |
> The one thing I'm leary of is moving the actual app from /bin/busybox |
| 3 |
> to /ginit. IANACP (I Am Not A C Programmer), let alone a developer, so |
| 4 |
> I may be missing something. Is there an overwhelming reason to depart |
| 5 |
> from the standard location for busybox? Why move the binary to /ginit, |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
please read the rest of my e-mail. you snipped the part that explained why. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> rather than make a symlink from /bin/busybox to /ginit? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
i think you have this reversed. the current ebuild does symlink /bin/busybox |
| 12 |
to /ginit. |
| 13 |
-mike |
Archives