1 |
Il giorno gio, 10/02/2011 alle 22.03 +0100, Andreas K. Huettel ha |
2 |
scritto: |
3 |
> Hey come on. If you really wanted to find a maintainer, you'd have |
4 |
> given me |
5 |
> the time to check back with upstream instead of just refusing a |
6 |
> revert. |
7 |
|
8 |
You get to maintain (and unmask) the package *after* it's fixed. Not |
9 |
before. |
10 |
|
11 |
Unmasking a package that is *broken* because you feel you *may* get the |
12 |
next version working is simply wrong. |
13 |
|
14 |
If you really wanted to fix it this bad, you would have done so rather |
15 |
than spent the time bitching on the mailing list. |
16 |
|
17 |
Repeat after me: "I won't unmask packages until they are fixed". |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes |
21 |
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |