1 |
Ühel kenal päeval, T, 18.04.2017 kell 11:16, kirjutas Jörg Schaible: |
2 |
> Hi Tomas, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Tomas Mozes wrote: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Jörg Schaible < |
7 |
> > joerg.schaible@×××××××××××.com> wrote: |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > > Hi, |
10 |
> > > |
11 |
> > > according the logs, gcc 4.5.0-r3 is stable for amd64: |
12 |
> > > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/sys-devel/gcc?showm |
13 |
> > > sg=1 |
14 |
> > > |
15 |
> > > However, after synching the tree, this version is still unstable |
16 |
> > > for me. |
17 |
> > > Looking at the packages overview, it becomes even more weird, |
18 |
> > > because |
19 |
> > > there seem to be two 4.5.0-r3 versions, one stable for amd64 and |
20 |
> > > one |
21 |
> > > unstable: https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-devel/gcc |
22 |
> > > |
23 |
> > > Can someone shed some light on this? |
24 |
> > > |
25 |
> > > Cheers, |
26 |
> > > Jörg |
27 |
> > > |
28 |
> > > |
29 |
> > > |
30 |
> > |
31 |
> > On which platform do you have it unstable? The packages problem is |
32 |
> > probably related to: |
33 |
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=612178 |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Amd64. |
36 |
> |
37 |
> Yes, it might be the same problem. The ebuild for gcc-4.5.0-r3 on my |
38 |
> machine |
39 |
> lists amd64 as unstable after synching the tree while the ebuild |
40 |
> available |
41 |
> over packages.gentoo.org has a stable version in KEYWORDS. |
42 |
> |
43 |
> Even if some GIT mirrors might be out of sync, it does not explain |
44 |
> why |
45 |
> https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-devel/gcc lists the same |
46 |
> version |
47 |
> more than once. |
48 |
|
49 |
This is a packages.gentoo.org Ruby on Rails webapp bug, and has |
50 |
absolutely nothing to do with some package being stable on an |
51 |
architecture or not. Don't let that disturb you. |
52 |
|
53 |
|
54 |
Mart |