| 1 |
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 12:37 PM Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> >>>>> On Tue, 12 Jul 2022, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> >> The snarkiness of Michał's comment left aside, in general "the name that |
| 6 |
> >> you would use to present yourself to your colleagues" won't work. It is |
| 7 |
> >> one of the examples in [1]: |
| 8 |
> >> |
| 9 |
> >> | 4. People have, at this point in time, one full name which they go by. |
| 10 |
> >> | Not so, even in Western countries, where a woman may choose to retain |
| 11 |
> >> | her unmarried name at work (where she is already known by that name), |
| 12 |
> >> | and use her husband’s surname on social occasions, and even on legal |
| 13 |
> >> | documents such as mortgages and loans. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> > So what's the problem? That people can have more than one "real name"? |
| 16 |
> > Can't they just pick one? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> With the suggested new wording she would have to use the name by which |
| 19 |
> she is known at work. That may not be the name she prefers otherwise. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
The suggested wording uses that as an example. |
Archives