| 1 |
24.09.2013 23:07, Markos Chandras пишет: |
| 2 |
> On 09/24/2013 07:28 PM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 09/23/2013 22:41, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> (unless of course you want to increase your number of cvs commits |
| 5 |
>>> which is a worrying argument on its own) |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
>> 11:16 #gentoo-bugs: <+bonsaikitten> ago: do me a favour and |
| 8 |
>> de-keyword all affected packages for s390 |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
>> Also, nobody give me an award for the commits, so I really don't |
| 11 |
>> understand what you mean. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I don't understand why you quote something from Patrick. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> All I am saying, is to avoid mass-commits for no reason. The stable |
| 16 |
> keywords will be lost during time by removing old version of the packages. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I think optimal solution here is to СС unstable arches on stable |
| 21 |
requests for new versions of packages to let them drop stable keywords. |
| 22 |
And if they are silent - dropping keywords with all revdeps by |
| 23 |
maintainer itself when other arches are done with stabilization. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Best regards, Sergey Popov |
| 27 |
Gentoo developer |
| 28 |
Gentoo Desktop Effects project lead |
| 29 |
Gentoo Qt project lead |
| 30 |
Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead |
Archives