1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 22:33:26 +0100 Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> | Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a): |
4 |
> | > | What on earth are you talking about here? And why almost 6 months |
5 |
> | > | is not enough for someone to respond on a bug with a simple |
6 |
> | > | "we'll only support newer versions and don't care about MySQL |
7 |
> | > | 4.0.x any more, go drop it"? |
8 |
> | > |
9 |
> | > Priorities. The arch teams could be too busy dealing with other bugs |
10 |
> | > that matter more or too busy dealing with noise bugs. |
11 |
> | |
12 |
> | Sorry, taking 1 minute to respond on a bug after being poked for a |
13 |
> | couple of months is not a matter of priorities, but mere politeness |
14 |
> | and common sense. Seriously, you can't work productively with other |
15 |
> | people if they can't be bothered to write one sentence for months. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> There are an awful lot of bugs requiring an awful lot of attention... |
18 |
> |
19 |
|
20 |
That does bring up an interesting question though -- at what point do you just |
21 |
ignore the arch and move on so that development can continue? |
22 |
|
23 |
I suppose if you had a nasty security verbump you needed to release, you could |
24 |
keyword it yourself, but for everything else, what's the best way to handle |
25 |
those if you are perpetually ignored? |
26 |
|
27 |
Steve |
28 |
-- |
29 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |