1 |
On 03/12/2010 10:11 PM, Jeremy Olexa wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:18:03 +0200, Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> |
4 |
> wrote: |
5 |
>> There seems to be two different schools on who to assign a keywording |
6 |
>> bug with only a single arch. I have myself assigned it to the arch in |
7 |
>> question but there's a difference of opinion here: |
8 |
>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=272160#c5 |
9 |
>> Let's get agreed on a single approach and I will add a note here: |
10 |
>> http://devmanual.gentoo.org/keywording/index.html |
11 |
>> I naturally support the approach I have been doing as I think the arch |
12 |
>> team is the one in charge. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> The "problem" with assigning bugs to arch teams is when the user comments |
15 |
> on the bug after it is resolved. If the arch team is CC'd, they remove |
16 |
> themselves when done and any comments after the bug is closed goes to |
17 |
> someone that is interested. If the arch team is assigned, then the comment |
18 |
> basically goes to /dev/null. So, if we are to improve the user experience, |
19 |
> assign to maintainer and CC arch team. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> -Jeremy |
22 |
> |
23 |
|
24 |
When a bug is marked as fixed it doesn't show up in searches developers |
25 |
use so it's a matter of who reads the email and acts upon it. I don't |
26 |
see why maintainers would be any more likely to act than an arch team |
27 |
comprised of multiple people in the case of bigger arches. Let's not |
28 |
forget that users are really supposed to open new bugs instead of |
29 |
commenting on the resolved ones although I know there are users out |
30 |
there who rather comment on a two year old only distantly related bug |
31 |
than open a new one. |
32 |
|
33 |
Regards, |
34 |
Petteri |