| 1 |
On 10/23/20 3:50 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 2 |
>>>>>> On Thu, 22 Oct 2020, Aisha Tammy wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> and remove 'xdm' from the default runlevel and add 'display-manager': |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>> rc-update del xdm default |
| 7 |
>> rc-update add display-manager default |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> So, no automatic upgrade path for users? I am asking again, what is the |
| 10 |
> rationale for renaming? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I agree that "display-manager" might be a slightly better name than |
| 13 |
> "xdm", but that's more than outweighted by the trouble that the renaming |
| 14 |
> would impose on users. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Ulrich |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
I could run these commands conditionally in postinst to make this |
| 19 |
an automatic upgrade for people who have 'xdm' currently installed and |
| 20 |
enabled in the default runlevel. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
But I really don't think that running these commands is that big an |
| 23 |
inconvenience. |
Archives