Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Richard Yao <ryao@×××××××××××××.edu>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default?
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 23:24:48
Message-Id: 4FC55A4F.4000706@cs.stonybrook.edu
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default? by Zac Medico
On 05/29/12 18:11, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 05/29/2012 02:47 PM, Hilco Wijbenga wrote: >> On 29 May 2012 12:46, Michael Orlitzky <michael@××××××××.com> wrote: >>> How about introducing e.g. FEATURES="nouserpriv", and make the current >>> userpriv behavior the default? >> >> rootpriv instead of nouserpriv? > > What's the use case for this? Can't we just enable userpriv > unconditionally, so that it doesn't have to be listed in FEATURES? Note > that ebuilds will still be able to use RESTRICT=userpriv if necessary.
Would FEATURES=-userpriv still work at the command line? It could be useful for debugging to keep that working.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies