1 |
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 10:08:22 +0100 |
2 |
Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Ohey, |
5 |
> |
6 |
> I've opened a bug at: |
7 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=573922 |
8 |
> |
9 |
> The idea here is to change the order of the providers of virtual/udev. |
10 |
> For existing installs this has zero impact. |
11 |
> For stage3 this would mean that eudev is pulled in instead of udev. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> The rationale behind this is: |
14 |
> |
15 |
> * eudev is an in-house fork, and there's more than a dozen distros |
16 |
> already using it by default that are not us. Which is a little bit |
17 |
> weird ... |
18 |
> |
19 |
> * Both udev and eudev have pretty much feature parity, so there won't |
20 |
> be any user-visible changes |
21 |
> |
22 |
> * udev upstream strongly discourages standalone udev (without systemd) |
23 |
> since at least 2012 |
24 |
> |
25 |
> (see for example: |
26 |
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2012-June/005516.html |
27 |
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/3/618 |
28 |
> ) |
29 |
> |
30 |
> So it'd be (1) following upstreams recommendations and (2) dogfooding |
31 |
> our own tools. I don't see any downsides to this :) |
32 |
> |
33 |
|
34 |
+1 |
35 |
|
36 |
I switched to eudev a few years ago and glad I did. |
37 |
|
38 |
The non-systemd profiles should have eudev as default. |
39 |
|
40 |
-- |
41 |
Brian Dolbec <dolsen> |