From: | "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o> |
---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o |
Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla? |
Date: | Sat, 03 Apr 2010 09:50:21 |
Message-Id: | 4BB70F5E.7010101@gentoo.org |
1 | I don't think later is valid resolution. If there's a valid bug it just |
2 | means it's never looked at again. If the bug is not valid then a |
3 | different resolution should be used. So what do you think about |
4 | disabling later? I would like to avoid things like this: |
5 | |
6 | https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113121#c21 |
7 | |
8 | Not applicable to the bug above but in general our social contract says: |
9 | "We will not hide problems" |
10 | |
11 | Regards, |
12 | Petteri |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla? | Krzysztof Pawlik <nelchael@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla? | "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <jmbsvicetto@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla? | "Tiziano Müller" <dev-zero@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla? | Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla? | Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla? | "Rémi Cardona" <remi@g.o> |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla? | Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o> |