| 1 |
On Saturday 16 April 2005 14:38, Paul Varner wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 06:56 +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote: |
| 3 |
> > The way I see it, we have three options: |
| 4 |
> > - package.mask (downgrades for those early adopters) |
| 5 |
> > - keep the same layout (/etc/apache2/conf, etc.) and wait until 2.2 is |
| 6 |
> > out to change it |
| 7 |
> > - have the newer apache ebuilds migrate from old-style to new-style |
| 8 |
> > config (very hard to do, but possible) |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> As a user whose apache install is completely hosed at the moment due to |
| 11 |
> these changes, my recommendation is all the above, with it being package |
| 12 |
> masked immediately. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I disagree. This will actually put you in an inconsistent state as the old |
| 15 |
apache overlaps with apr/apr-util. What I think would be the best solution is |
| 16 |
to undo the config changes, but keep the apr change in a new ebuild set that |
| 17 |
get's updated to (up or downgrading I don't care). |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Paul |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 23 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 24 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 25 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives