1 |
Piotr Jaroszy?ski wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Hello, |
4 |
> |
5 |
> looks like every nominee wants the council to be more technical so I |
6 |
> have a few technical questions for you: |
7 |
> |
8 |
> 1. GLEP54 |
9 |
Doit! |
10 |
|
11 |
> 2. GLEP55 |
12 |
Good idea. But the GLEP still contains too many "may"'s and "should"'s. |
13 |
Example: "[...] but note that one should never explicitly set both EAPIs to |
14 |
different values. [...]". Define it clearer: "It is not allowed to set both |
15 |
EAPIs.". |
16 |
|
17 |
And why don't we change the versioning of the EAPI to a "X.Y" scheme and |
18 |
demand that changes in the minor version must not break sourcing of the |
19 |
ebuild with older package managers and that major versions do. |
20 |
Major version numbers are written in the postfix, while minor version |
21 |
numbers are written in the ebuild itself as EAPI_MINOR="1". So, the current |
22 |
EAPI 1 would then be in fact "0.1". |
23 |
|
24 |
Cheers, |
25 |
Tiziano |
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |