| 1 |
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 09:53 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 14:11 +0000, LostSon wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Wednesday 23 March 2005 05:10 pm, Aron Griffis wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > LostSon wrote: [Tue Mar 22 2005, 07:44:38PM EST] |
| 5 |
> > > |
| 6 |
> > > > This had been brought to my attention earlier and my laptop's time |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > and |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > > > date is set right. Unfortunately this doesnt help either. |
| 11 |
> > > |
| 12 |
> > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37958 |
| 13 |
> > > |
| 14 |
> > > -- |
| 15 |
> > > Aron Griffis |
| 16 |
> > > Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > -- |
| 19 |
> > Ok i read through that bug and have followed its suggestions |
| 20 |
> > recompiled my |
| 21 |
> > gcc. Made sure my time was correct and its still looping away. Maybe |
| 22 |
> > its just |
| 23 |
> > time for a fresh install or something. I have to have my laptop in |
| 24 |
> > good |
| 25 |
> > working order. Seriously discouraged. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Not very scientific, but try: |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> $ touch foo; find / -newer foo |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> maybe its not a header from gcc that is newer ? |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Too late started a fresh install but thanks anyway |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
LostSon |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
http://www.lostsonsvault.org |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
Public Key |
| 43 |
http://www.lostsonsvault.org/dls/lostson.asc |
Archives