Archives
Archives
| From: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: comprehensive eclass checking in repoman | ||
| Date: | Fri, 25 May 2012 15:41:51 | ||
| Message-Id: | 201205251142.11122.vapier@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: comprehensive eclass checking in repoman by Ryan Hill |
||
| 1 | On Thursday 24 May 2012 23:47:23 Ryan Hill wrote: |
| 2 | > Is there any sane way to handle sub-eclasses? eg. foo-base inherits |
| 3 | > foo-functions. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | i was thinking of extending the metadata to handle this. did you have any |
| 6 | specific ideas in mind ? i can see inheriting say distutils should not require |
| 7 | people to also inherit python eclasses ... |
| 8 | -mike |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: comprehensive eclass checking in repoman | Alexey Shvetsov <alexxy@g.o> |