Archives
Archives
| From: | Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New GLEP: file installation masks | ||
| Date: | Fri, 20 May 2016 15:40:55 | ||
| Message-Id: | 573F2FF7.6080704@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New GLEP: file installation masks by Daniel Campbell |
||
| 1 | On 05/20/2016 11:34 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > ...and the user has this in their install.mask file: |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > [bash-completion] |
| 6 | > path=/some/other/path |
| 7 | > desc=some other description |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | |
| 10 | I don't think that's allowed; the groups are specified by each |
| 11 | repository's metadata/install-mask.conf, not by the users. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Although, you can ask the same question about overlays that have |
| 14 | group-name clashes. Is that an error, or would we use the one from the |
| 15 | overlay? |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New GLEP: file installation masks | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> |