| 1 |
maillog: 30/04/2005-13:27:44(+0100): Elfyn McBratney types |
| 2 |
> On Saturday 30 Apr 2005 13:07, Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Saturday 30 April 2005 13:12, Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 12:31:17 +0200 |
| 5 |
> > > |
| 6 |
> > > Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen <jaervosz@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
> > > > On Friday 29 April 2005 16:38, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 8 |
> > > > > > Heh, I get that after every invocation of emerge. :) |
| 9 |
> > > > > |
| 10 |
> > > > > Yep. That's the scanning of all installed packages for any provided |
| 11 |
> > > > > virtuals. |
| 12 |
> > > > |
| 13 |
> > > > Why not let Portage print that before scanning? |
| 14 |
> > > |
| 15 |
> > > Print what? |
| 16 |
> > > The scanning is done on the general config parsing, and you can't really |
| 17 |
> > > do anything before that. |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > Scanning configuration/installed packages or something. It just seems a bit |
| 20 |
> > more userfriendly to print something if it takes a long while to do |
| 21 |
> > anything. |
| 22 |
> > |
| 23 |
> > Just my to 0.02€ |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Sounds good to me, if possible. Could we maybe be more noisy here when people |
| 26 |
> run with --verbose ? You know, so your not left staring at nothingness while |
| 27 |
> portage does it's imports, scans, whatever .. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Also consider that Control-C doesn't really do anything at that stage. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
/ Georgi Georgiev / "Why can't we ever attempt to solve a / |
| 33 |
\ chutz@×××.net \ problem in this country without having a \ |
| 34 |
/ +81(90)2877-8845 / 'War' on it?" -- Rich Thomson, / |
| 35 |
\ ------------------- \ talk.politics.misc \ |
Archives