| 1 |
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 09:53:44AM +0200, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 03:27:35 -0400 |
| 3 |
> Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > Er, they already block each other and dependencies should be on |
| 6 |
> > virtual/motif... |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I know for the virtual, but I confirm they don't block each other: |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> thomas@gromit thomas $ emerge -pv openmotif lesstif |
| 11 |
> These are the packages that I would merge, in order: |
| 12 |
> Calculating dependencies ...done! |
| 13 |
> [ebuild R ] x11-libs/openmotif-2.2.2-r2 |
| 14 |
> [ebuild N ] x11-libs/lesstif-0.93.40 |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Ah, crap. You're right. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I'm pretty sure they used to block. What happened? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
(poke @ raker) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> A nice way to not forget this kind of block would be if portage was able |
| 24 |
> to distinguish between virtuals that may accept several providers and |
| 25 |
> those that can accept only exactly one. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
We handle this in the ebuilds in DEPEND (by using !). |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Jon Portnoy |
| 32 |
avenj/irc.freenode.net |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives