Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages needing new maintainers
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 18:49:25
Message-Id: 20070712184555.GG12664@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages needing new maintainers by Mike Frysinger
1 On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 08:16:09PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
2 > On Tuesday 10 July 2007, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
3 > > For various reasons, I've got a couple of packages that I'm not really
4 > > very well suited to maintain going on. I added them over the course of past
5 > > jobs and university courses, but I have no further need of them, and they
6 > > really could use people that actually use them.
7 > for any of the sys-* ones, you probably already have base-system listed, but
8 > just in case, you can add it as the herd ...
9 Some of them don't list base-system, because they were fringe enough
10 already. I'll add them to base-system if I don't find anybody else more
11 interested.
12
13 > > Hardware, for tuning network cards. In new enough kernels (should be most
14 > > of 2.6), this is obsoleted by mii-tools and ethtool:
15 > > sys-apps/nictools
16 > i think we should scrub mii-tools, ethtool, and nictools ... latest net-tools
17 > should provide all of these i believe
18 How is net-tools for those arches still on 2.4 kernels?
19 net-tools does not contain ethtool (which is badly out of date upstream,
20 the Git has moved a long way since they last did a release).
21
22 --
23 Robin Hugh Johnson
24 Gentoo Linux Developer & Council Member
25 E-Mail : robbat2@g.o
26 GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85