Archives
Archives
| From: | Kent Fredric <kentnl@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-client/phantomjs and dev-ruby/poltergeist | ||
| Date: | Mon, 05 Jun 2017 17:50:39 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20170606054708.1f811680@katipo2.lan | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-client/phantomjs and dev-ruby/poltergeist by Michael Orlitzky |
||
| 1 | On Mon, 5 Jun 2017 13:42:50 -0400 |
| 2 | Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > Hans was |
| 5 | > attempting to fix it, but now that upstream is dead, it will remain |
| 6 | > insecure forever. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | IME, as long as that's clear from the pmask, and its clear what those |
| 9 | security vectors are, as long as an end user makes sure those vectors |
| 10 | can't happen, having an insecure-in-theory-but-not-in-practice |
| 11 | phantomjs is better than having no phantomjs. |