Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: "scm" in GLEP 54
Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 20:06:37
Message-Id: 4A106E85.9060806@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: "scm" in GLEP 54 (was: Council meeting summary for meeting on May 14, 2009) by Joe Peterson
1 Joe Peterson wrote:
2 > I have not seen much discussion lately regarding the choice of the string, "scm"
3 > in this GLEP. I asked the author today on IRC, and he said he doesn't have a
4 > particularly strong reason for "scm" beyond historical reasons.
5 >
6 > Since we are stuck with the string once it is adopted, I think we should
7 > consider the choice carefully. Personally, I'd prefer "live", since it is what
8 > we've been calling these ebuilds for a long time, it's easier to remember (and
9 > more "catchy"), and it seems to carry the spirit of what we mean by these kinds
10 > of ebuilds. Also, there is a new in-ebuild property with the signifier "live".
11
12 Personally I think there is humor in the scum (as I pronounce it). But
13 seriously, I think live makes sense, and would likely be clearer to our
14 users as well.
15
16 Cheers,
17 --
18 Ben de Groot
19 Gentoo Linux developer (qt, media, lxde, desktop-misc)
20 Gentoo Linux Release Engineering PR liaison
21 ______________________________________________________