Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: harley@×××××××××××××.net
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Problems with the current bzr eclass.
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 01:53:56
Message-Id: 51657.192.168.1.50.1247709233.squirrel@squirrelmail.biterror.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Problems with the current bzr eclass. by Christian Faulhammer
1 On Tue, July 14, 2009 4:37 am, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
2 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
3 > Hash: SHA1
4 >
5 >
6 > Hi,
7 >
8 >
9 > René 'Necoro' Neumann <lists@××××××.eu>:
10 >
11 >> Harley Peters schrieb:
12 >>
13 >>> I'm getting good numbers from the command line but in the ebuild
14 >>> it's much different. I haven't timed it but it takes about 25 minutes
15 >>> to do a full checkout and about a third that to do the light weight
16 >>> checkout. The update takes less than a minute with the full checkout.
17 >>> And it
18 >>> takes ten's of minutes with a lightweight checkout.
19 >>
20 >> I guess, the "bzr export" is the problem here ... see
21 >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr-gentoo-overlay/+bug/343218
22 >>
23 >
24 > Ok, that sounds bad. Which versions of Bazaar did you try?
25 >
26 >
27 > V-Li
28 >
29 >
30 > - --
31 > Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
32 > <URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
33 >
34 >
35 > <URL:http://gentoo.faulhammer.org/>
36 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
37 > Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)
38 >
39 >
40 > iEYEARECAAYFAkpcUcsACgkQNQqtfCuFneP+AACfdK0Z8D00GDF9fSIl1fU10LOi
41 > 5egAoJn58bGPaNAU54JweAlXSrCbj0ch
42 > =dTfd
43 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
44 >
45 >
46
47 Not sure who you are referring to but I was using bzr-1.16.1 and bzr-1.15.
48 Bzr export is definitely the problem for me.
49
50 Harley

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: Problems with the current bzr eclass. Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o>