1 |
On Friday 28 November 2003 01:19, Luke-Jr wrote: |
2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
4 |
> |
5 |
> On Thursday 27 November 2003 04:12 pm, Jason Wever wrote: |
6 |
> > My $0.02 is that if this gets implemented, it should be put in so that |
7 |
> > the default behavior is like portage is now, |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Since Portage as it is right now doesn't pay any attention to licenses, its |
10 |
> legality could be questioned (as with the games issue before?) |
11 |
|
12 |
My main concern from this perspective is whether "*" should be available at |
13 |
all. |
14 |
|
15 |
> > and if you choose to restrict |
16 |
> > yourself to only free software or other licensing scheme, you can make |
17 |
> > the necessary changes yourself. Otherwise you will have a ton of users |
18 |
> > asking "why can't i emerge package foo?", or filing bugs because of this, |
19 |
> > etc. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> If Portage displays a clear enough message, there shouldn't be a problem |
22 |
> with this... |
23 |
|
24 |
This shouldn't be a problem as long as users get a *loud* advance warning. Not |
25 |
only should it be in pkg_postinst but maybe also in the GWN? |
26 |
|
27 |
> From a support perspective, if this gets implemented, I'm forwarding all |
28 |
> |
29 |
> > of these questions, bugs, etc to the "free and only free" software folks. |
30 |
> > Please dont' take away one "freedom" for another. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> As long as there is an option (editing the ACCEPT_LICENSES), there is no |
33 |
> freedom being removed. |
34 |
|
35 |
I think the osf/fsf licenses are the best default. From what I've seen working |
36 |
on a licensing patch, most of the base system is covered by a handful of |
37 |
licenses. I have 352 packages installed on my system and my ACCEPT_LICENCE is |
38 |
as follows: |
39 |
ACCEPT_LICENSE="Artistic MIT ZLIB BZIP2 FLEX CRACKLIB LGPL-2 NVIDIA LGPL-2.1 |
40 |
BSD fontconfig Info-ZIP X11 MSttfEULA PSF-2.2 freedist BAEKMUK Arphic |
41 |
free-noncomm sun-bcla-java-vm DB IPL-1 DIVX MOTIF XAnim public-domain FDL-1.1 |
42 |
wxWinLL-3 OpenSoftware as-is GPL-2" |
43 |
|
44 |
There's 31 licenses there. Installing all of gnome only requires PYTHON for |
45 |
pyxml MPL-1.1 and NPL-1.1 for mozilla and Ximian-logos for bug-buddy. I |
46 |
haven't looked into the licenses themselves so I don't know what would be |
47 |
"free" and "non-free" but it's definately not the maintenance nightmare |
48 |
people are worried about. |
49 |
|
50 |
Regards, |
51 |
Jason Stubbs |
52 |
|
53 |
|
54 |
-- |
55 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |