Archives
Archives
| From: | Kent Fredric <kentnl@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Anti-spam for goose | ||
| Date: | Sun, 24 May 2020 15:21:57 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20200525032140.1f8d5c15@katipo2.lan | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Anti-spam for goose by Peter Stuge |
||
| 1 | On Sun, 24 May 2020 13:05:35 +0000 |
| 2 | Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > The bar only needs to be raised high enough. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Sure. A lot of this is just "think about what could happen in the worst |
| 7 | case imaginable". |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Its very unlikely our worst cases will happen. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | But we should at least have the ability to easily add mitigations in |
| 12 | future if things do get worse. |