1 |
Hi, |
2 |
|
3 |
On 11/12/2022 13.46, Sam James wrote: |
4 |
> You should still file a bug for two reasons: |
5 |
> 1. Paper trail |
6 |
> 2. sys-auth/pambase has another maintainer who*is* active :) |
7 |
> |
8 |
> As for the question in your post, I'll have a think. Thanks! |
9 |
|
10 |
I am not against creating a bug, I do see it however as inefficient in |
11 |
this very case. |
12 |
|
13 |
I do know however if I were to create bug and assign it to current |
14 |
single pam maintainer, it would hardly get noticed by other people, |
15 |
greatly reducing the feedback. Changing defaults will affect vast |
16 |
majority of Gentoo users, so gentoo-dev ml was the place I choosen. |
17 |
|
18 |
I didn't realized that you are maintainer of pambase, though the |
19 |
/etc/security/limits.conf belongs to sys-libs/pam that has only zlogene. |
20 |
|
21 |
I did mail zlogene regarding another package recently and got no |
22 |
response, thus pam itself seems maintainer-needed to me, and because of |
23 |
it a candidate for me to join as another maintainer and do the changes. |
24 |
I do not think it would make much sense for me to then create bug for |
25 |
myself to make this change of defaults, paper trail would be the commit |
26 |
subject and message itself, or perhaps I did not understood of what you |
27 |
meant here by paper trail, would appreciate clarification. |
28 |
|
29 |
It would be great if you were interested in joining pam itself, and I am |
30 |
interested to also joining pambase, since those are so co-dependent it |
31 |
does not make sense to have split maintainers there. |
32 |
|
33 |
-- Piotr. |