| 1 |
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 14:05 +0200, Natanael Copa wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 13:06 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Hi folks, |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > JFYI: I've made an mii-tool single distribution, which is |
| 6 |
> > independent from the rest of the net-tools stuff. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > http://www.metux.de/articles/oss/mii-tool-1_9_1_1 |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > This is especially interesting for embedded systems with plenty |
| 11 |
> > of space. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
(embedded with plenty of space? kinda funny) If you had plenty of space |
| 14 |
then chances are you would be going the net-tools route. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Cool! |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> It would be even more interesting if you could get it into busybox |
| 20 |
> and/or get it into portage. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
busybox absolutely seems the ideal place for cut out utils. |
| 23 |
mii-tool is a handy one also. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
> -- |
| 27 |
> Natanael Copa |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
| 31 |
Gentoo Linux |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives