1 |
* Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> schrieb: |
2 |
> On Thursday, December 30, 2010 20:05:01 Enrico Weigelt wrote: |
3 |
> > IMHO, in longer terms, all patches should normalized, created w/ |
4 |
> > diff -ruN and applied w/ -p1. Thats how most people do it, so |
5 |
> > a kind of semi-standard. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> not worth developer's time to force it since it poses no practical positive |
8 |
> benefit to us |
9 |
|
10 |
It makes it easier for everyone who'll want to work on these |
11 |
patches (eg. people besides the actual ebuild maintainers). |
12 |
|
13 |
BTW: I'm not proposing to rework all the patches right now, |
14 |
just set a policy for new ones. |
15 |
|
16 |
Even you might not like to hear this, Debian is much better at this |
17 |
point - they a patchqueue per each package, which can be applied |
18 |
fully automatically (w/o additional code in the invididual package |
19 |
descriptors). This allows easy importing into other systems |
20 |
(like I'm doing w/ my normalized git repositories within the |
21 |
oss-qm project). |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
cu |
25 |
-- |
26 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
27 |
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/ |
28 |
|
29 |
phone: +49 36207 519931 email: weigelt@×××××.de |
30 |
mobile: +49 151 27565287 icq: 210169427 skype: nekrad666 |
31 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
32 |
Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme |
33 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------- |