1 |
On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 4:38:57 PM EST Michael Mol wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> You're asserting that Red Hat and Debian do things differently because |
4 |
> there's nobody to force them to do things the same way. It can't be because |
5 |
> there's no reference for them to look at; for sure, the second into market |
6 |
> could simply have looked at the first. It's probable they did. |
7 |
|
8 |
I would recommend doing some research on LSB. If Debian gave up deb for RPM, |
9 |
then you would see more unification. Ultimately the two had different origins, |
10 |
purposes, and thus can only align on some things but not all. |
11 |
|
12 |
You can only push standards so far. When you have two different opposing ways |
13 |
of doing something. A call has to be made as to which to standardize unless |
14 |
you do both. It is impossible to please everyone all the time when it comes to |
15 |
consensus stuff. People have different ideas and will accomplish the same |
16 |
things in different ways. |
17 |
|
18 |
Look at the whole systemd thing that came out of RedHat and took over the |
19 |
Linux world. It damn near fractured Debian, and did create a fork. Most other |
20 |
distros including Debian gave in. |
21 |
|
22 |
Gentoo is one of the few still offering an alternative OpenRC. Much like the |
23 |
UID/GID thing I blame Gentoo for OpenRC not being adopted more widely and |
24 |
giving room for things like systemd to take over with little alternative for |
25 |
most. |
26 |
|
27 |
This kind of thing will happen again and again. Though if other distros do not |
28 |
start leading. It will become more and more a RedHat lead Linux world. Though |
29 |
some things go the other way. RedHat seems to have adopted Debians |
30 |
alternatives system, which is basically eselect, and related tools *-config. |
31 |
|
32 |
But we are way off topic to the userkit.eclass and UID/GID. New thread, but I |
33 |
am past the discussion. Thanks! |
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |