Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: kerberos, virtuals, rattling cages
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:03:45
Message-Id: pan$ecfce$57354ce3$e14203ff$2d9d3779@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] kerberos, virtuals, rattling cages by Eray Aslan
1 Eray Aslan posted on Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:02:49 +0200 as excerpted:
2
3 >> > I don't think samba will support MIT, since it's kinda windows
4 >> > focused.
5 >
6 > Ugh, no. MIT is not windows focused
7
8 ... But samba is...
9
10
11 As far as the thread in general goes, the question arises, if you're
12 running both samba and nfs, why? They're both network-based-filesystems
13 that in theory at least should have reasonably similar functionality, so
14 an admittedly not particularly clueful reaction is "if it hurts when you
15 do that, stop doing it".
16
17 --
18 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
19 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
20 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: kerberos, virtuals, rattling cages Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: kerberos, virtuals, rattling cages Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com>