1 |
David Leverton kirjoitti: |
2 |
> On Saturday 20 September 2008 18:15:27 Alexis Ballier wrote: |
3 |
>> I can think of checks like: |
4 |
>> - foo is a dep/rdep of bar |
5 |
>> - foo has a "plugin like" architecture |
6 |
>> - bar will "work" with minimal foo |
7 |
>> - most people will expect some features in bar that come with foo's |
8 |
>> plugins |
9 |
>> - we might want to display warnings for the most useful features |
10 |
>> - having useflags in bar for each of foo's useflags doesn't seem wise |
11 |
> |
12 |
> If you mean something like |
13 |
> |
14 |
> built_with_use cat/foo coolfeature || ewarn "bar will be more useful if |
15 |
> you rebuild cat/foo with USE=coolfeature" |
16 |
> |
17 |
> then you can use |
18 |
> |
19 |
> has_version 'cat/foo[coolfeature]' || ... |
20 |
> |
21 |
> instead. |
22 |
> |
23 |
|
24 |
What does this report if cat/foo does not have coolfeature use flag in |
25 |
some version? Meaning can this support cases which need --missing true. |
26 |
|
27 |
Regards, |
28 |
Petteri |