Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo commit in xml/htdocs/proj/en/qa: index.xml
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 17:00:12
Message-Id: 20110611185846.7dcab389@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo commit in xml/htdocs/proj/en/qa: index.xml by "Diego Elio Pettenò"
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 18:13:14 +0200
Diego Elio Pettenò <flameeyes@×××××.com> wrote:

> Il giorno sab, 11/06/2011 alle 17.33 +0200, Jeroen Roovers ha scritto: > > > > Reading all this, I kept wondering how you think your self-appointed > > position as "team lead" (look how I'm stretching the definition > > there) is still tenable. Good luck there. > > I'd suggest you to know facts before slandering your fellow > developers.
You mean slandering is morally unobjectionable? Never mind.
> I'm *not* a self-appointed lead, I've been voted in.
Why doesn't GLEP 48 mention this process? Seeing how QA is becoming this monster that regularly upsets the majority of the volunteers on this project, and is at the same time grabbing power left and right, it is important to have this set in stone. jer

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo commit in xml/htdocs/proj/en/qa: index.xml "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <jmbsvicetto@g.o>