From: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: comprehensive eclass checking in repoman | ||
Date: | Fri, 25 May 2012 00:14:26 | ||
Message-Id: | 201205242014.42839.vapier@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: comprehensive eclass checking in repoman by Steven J Long |
1 | On Thursday 24 May 2012 18:16:23 Steven J Long wrote: |
2 | > You could maybe tighten the false-negative side by scanning all functions |
3 | > defined in an eclass, and warning if they're undocumented. |
4 | |
5 | that happens now when you emerge eclass-manpages, but i suspect no one cares. |
6 | if you run the script by hand on your eclass, it'll tell you the same thing. |
7 | -mike |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |